5G Doesn't Cause Coronavirus, but Coronavirus Might Cause 5G
5G Doesn't Cause Coronavirus, just Coronavirus Might Cause 5G
5G does not cause cancer. 5G does not cause coronavirus. Anyone claiming that they do is wrong. They may be wrong out of ignorance, fearfulness, and a desire to make themselves as safe as possible in an uncertain and frightening time. Or they may exist some combination of liar, troll, and all-around jerk who savor stirring the pot at the one fourth dimension in recent history when the pot needed stirring the to the lowest degree.
Nosotros've covered how and why 5G doesn't cause cancer in the by, so I'grand non going to spend also much fourth dimension debating it again. Today — like every day in this beautiful new reality we are all collectively enjoying — nosotros're going to talk about how 5G doesn't — and tin can't — cause coronavirus.
Covid-nineteen Is Caused past a Virus
SARS-CoV-ii is what is known every bit a unmarried-strand RNA virus. It is similar to the coronaviruses that live in bats and may have been transmitted to humans through a secondary pangolin host. Because this virus is zoonotic — a illness that can be transmitted to humans from animals — we already have a good idea where it came from. SARS-CoV-2 is the virus that causes the affliction known as Covid-19. Transmission is primarily droplet-born, though the virus has some ability to live on surfaces when outside the body. The incubation menstruation for Covid-19 is a median of five days, with a range of 0-xiv days. Humans were outset exposed to SARS-CoV-2, as far as we know right at present, at what is known every bit a wet market place in Wuhan, Cathay. (Wet markets are places where meat, fish, and produce are sold, every bit compared with "dry out" markets, where electronic appurtenances or household supplies are sold.)
Dissimilar the Spanish flu pandemic, which killed mostly young and healthy people, Covid-xix appears to hit the elderly hard. Young people who die as a outcome of SARS-CoV-2 are sometimes dying in systemic reactions called cytokine storms, merely the Spanish flu from 1918-1919 was far more probable to cause cytokine storms than Covid-19 appears to be thus far. This is a very skillful thing.
Once within the trunk, Covid-xix attaches itself to a host cell using its spike protein, perchance binding to the angiostatin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on human cells. SARS-COV-2 has a higher affinity for ACE2 receptors in human cells than the original SARS did.
Once SARS-CoV-ii has penetrated a host cell, information technology begins replicating the way all viruses practise. Your own cells are forced to industry more copies of the virus, which spill out of the original host jail cell into the body. Scientists have taken actual photos of SARS-CoV-2 emerging from human cells cultured in the lab, as shown below:
Nosotros have established where SARS-CoV-two came from and the species in which it originated. Nosotros know how it acts one time inside the body. At no point does SARS-CoV-2 rely on or react to the presence of ambient EM energy of the sort that exists in the temper around u.s.a. on an ongoing basis.
Let's Talk About 5G
The fifth Generation (5G) radio standard is comprised of several different components. 5G can be deployed in existing sub-6GHz spectrum, which is how T-Mobile and most of the rest of the earth do it, or in mmWave signals at 20GHz+ frequency ranges. The sub-6GHz spectrum that T-Mobile is using offers range that's closer to LTE, but only modestly improves on performance. This type of 5G is more similar "LTE+" in terms of the performance benefits y'all'll gain than anything similar the leap from 3G – LTE.
What about the other type of 5G, mmWave? Millimeter-moving ridge radiation has some singled-out characteristics, all of which can be boiled down into a 2-sentence summary: It sucks.
Why? Because millimeter waves don't travel for shit. This chart from SureCall basically summarizes the trouble:
5G can't penetrate obstacles. What counts as an obstruction? Well, first you've got the usual things: Wood, rock, metallic, etc. And so yous've got the less-usual things, including rain, water molecules in the atmosphere more generally, humans, sheets of paper, and transparent drinking glass. If 5G'southward obstacle penetration rate is 15-30x worse than LTE's, yous can bet one of the things it literally isn't penetrating is you lot.
This is literally the reason why 5G is such a bad idea to invest in correct now. Outside of downtown metro areas and stadiums, there's virtually nowhere you can meaningfully benefit from having 5G access. 5G hasn't even been deployed across most of the U.s.a., which is another reason why it tin can't possibly be responsible for a illness outbreak. Most of you don't have information technology. AT&T customers who run into "5G E" on their cell phones, don't worry — that's just a lie AT&T made upwardly and wasn't punished for. Your "5G E" is exactly the aforementioned as everyone else'due south "LTE."
The thought that 5G can cause (or exacerbate) a coronavirus infection is just a twist on the idea that cell phones cause cancer. There'south no truth to either. The trouble with the 5G argument is that the types of 5G deployed in Prc versus in the U.s.a., non to mention Europe, are different. European 5G doesn't use the same frequencies that American 5G does. American 5G is different from Chinese 5G. Phones that support all of the bands in question don't fifty-fifty exist yet, and 5G deployments in America are tiny.The reason why companies like Qualcomm have been caught distributing bad 5G reports in the first place is that existing 5G service just isn't very good.
We already know where coronavirus comes from. Nosotros've plant the animate being reservoirs. Nosotros've identified the source of the outbreak and, in many cases, traced local infections dorsum to specific individuals or group events. The idea that 5G could cause coronavirus outbreaks is being generated past trolls and liars, aided by frightened people who don't understand how all of this works. Don't be fooled. The problem with 5G is that 5G is a lousy idea and a bad economic deal for about people correct now. It doesn't cause cancer. Information technology doesn't crusade coronavirus, either.
Merely — hilariously — this might non keep to exist true. If Americans remain stuck at domicile and reliant on broadband service, it's potentially possible that nosotros'd run into companies respond to this by building out more capacity in local homes and areas. In some places, particularly cities, 5G might be an effective short-range backhaul. If companies knew that people were mostly working from home, they might be more willing to build these deployments at the calibration required to make them affordable.
5G doesn't crusade coronavirus — but there's a take a chance that coronavirus could cause 5G (deployments).
At present Read:
- Don't Believe the Scaremongering Virtually 5G, Cancer Rates
- Verizon Posts Depressingly Skimpy 5G Coverage Maps
- Verizon 5G Tin't Even Cover a Whole NBA Arena
Source: https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/307939-5g-doesnt-cause-coronavirus-but-coronavirus-might-cause-5g
Posted by: glassdiedich.blogspot.com
0 Response to "5G Doesn't Cause Coronavirus, but Coronavirus Might Cause 5G"
Post a Comment